| Number 143 of 200 messages in this Archive | ||
|---|---|---|
| [Date Prev] | Main Index | [Date Next] |
| [Thread Prev] | Thread Index | [Thread Next] |
DOCAGREN
Just a Lurker here on the Digest, But maybe I have a good idea or 2.. :-)
Or a few questions, that need answering
In a message dated Mon, 11 Feb 2008 10:53:03 -0700, "Binhan Lin" writes:
John,
I think your arguments basically boil down to experience.
Is this scenario is any different than a nervous MP or National Guard guy
being placed in a bad situation at a bad time - there are many instances of
improperly trained or equipped troops facing a large mob and then firing
live rounds after being sparked by a bottle or stone, simply because the
troops "felt" they were in danger. Is a soldier's intuition of danger any
different than a computer's analytical determination of the situation? In
both cases, it depends on the "training" or "programming" to make the
correct decision. Part of mob psychology is shaped by what the police
forces do - if the mob sense fear, it may embolden some to attack. Throwing
a rock and hitting a person is more morally stimulating than throwing a rock
and hitting a slab of armored plate. (i.e. this is why armored cars are so
imposing in riot situations- people know that a rock isn't going to do
squat.)
_______________________________________________ Gzg-l mailing list Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mead.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU:1337/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l