Re: [GZG] [OFFICIAL] Question: was Re: [SG3]: What if?

["K.H.Ranitzsch" <kh.ranitzsch@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

John Atkinson schrieb:

> bots = "I don't like being limited by morale rules and supressions"
> 
> IMHO.
> 
> That may not be why you're saying it.  It's why some people are saying it.
> 
> It removes a major strength and emphasis of the rules.  A game where
> robots dominate (and they will, if you allow them to be more or less
> infantry immune to morale and supression with no balancing
> disadvantages) will not be Stargrunt.

Robots should be subject to suppression and morale in a fashion similar 
to other troops.

Why ?

A trooper becomes suppressed when his immediate surroundings become too 
dangerous to continue with his mission - a robot that ignores this would 
very soon become a heap of scrap metal.

A platoon's morale fails when the situation is too hot to continue - 
again, only robots with a scrap-heap wish would go on regardless.

Greetings
Karl Heinz


_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mead.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU:1337/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l