GZG List archives -- February 2008

Number 117 of 200 messages in this Archive
[Date Prev] Main Index [Date Next]
[Thread Prev] Thread Index [Thread Next]

Re: [GZG] [OFFICIAL] Question: was Re: [SG3]: What if?



On Feb 10, 2008, at 8:51 AM, John Atkinson wrote:

>
> Nanites have been discussed to death on this list.
>
> Eventually the discussion runs down to this, every single time:
>
>

[snip]

I hear ya.  I think it's an exercise in restraint myself -- just  
because you can EVENTUALLY end at a particular point doesn't mean you  
have to game AT that point in time.

But having said that I guess a common theme is we should ignore every  
possibly fun scifi development because some power-gamer of the future  
will abuse it.  It's almost like you shouldn't even bother discussing  
*anything* because 200 messages later someone will say "two blobs  
converge on each other and that isn't fun."



_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mead.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU:1337/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l




  • Prev by Date: Re: [GZG] Question: was Re: [SG3]: What if?
  • Next by Date: Re: [GZG] [OFFICIAL] Question: was Re: [SG3]: What if?

  • Previous by thread: Re: [GZG] [OFFICIAL] Question: was Re: [SG3]: What if?
  • Next by thread: Re: [GZG] [OFFICIAL] Question: was Re: [SG3]: What if?

  • Main Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Archive Index

    roger@nospam.firedrake.org
    Generated: Sat Mar 15 02:07:24 GMT 2008