Re: [GZG] [OFFICIAL] Question: was Re: [SG3]: What if?

["John Atkinson" <johnmatkinson@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Feb 9, 2008 4:30 PM, John Lerchey <lerchey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I disagree.  Adding "bots" (remote controlled gun drones, terminators, etc.) simply modifies the specific sides infantry.  They are all still able to be engaged by "standard" infantry, and do not have to remove the fun of the game.
>
> Then again, I like DS types of battles with companies to battalions, so my take on what such might do to SG is somewhat limited. :)

bots = "I don't like being limited by morale rules and supressions"

IMHO.

That may not be why you're saying it.  It's why some people are saying it.

It removes a major strength and emphasis of the rules.  A game where
robots dominate (and they will, if you allow them to be more or less
infantry immune to morale and supression with no balancing
disadvantages) will not be Stargrunt.

John
-- 
"Thousands of Sarmatians, Thousands of Franks, we've slain them again
and again.  We're looking for thousands of Persians."
--Vita Aureliani

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mead.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU:1337/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l