GZG List archives -- February 2008

Number 86 of 200 messages in this Archive
[Date Prev] Main Index [Date Next]
[Thread Prev] Thread Index [Thread Next]

Re: [GZG] [OFFICIAL] Question: was Re: [SG3]: What if?





On Feb 9, 2008 6:10 AM, Ground Zero Games <jon@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Dragging this back to the particular question I asked, let me ask it
again in a slightly different way.
[...]
I am assuming that in order to get a "balanced" game, the forces
deployed will get smaller as the tech level increases; so to address
the specific question I asked, do folks WANT the small high-tech
infantry force to be able to shoot and kill enemy infantry at twice
or three times the range that lower-tech troops can, or do you just
want their fire to be more effective but at the same sort of ranges
throughout?

Personally, I'm with the latter. Ranges slightly better for high tech vs low, but volume and effectiveness of fire should be markedly better.

Just my non-military experience two bits worth. :-D

Mk

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mead.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU:1337/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l


  • Prev by Date: Re: [GZG] [OFFICIAL] Question: was Re: [SG3]: What if?
  • Next by Date: Re: [GZG] [OFFICIAL] Question: was Re: [SG3]: What if?

  • Previous by thread: Re: [GZG] Question: was Re: [SG3]: What if?
  • Next by thread: Re: [GZG] [OFFICIAL] Question: was Re: [SG3]: What if?

  • Main Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Archive Index

    roger@nospam.firedrake.org
    Generated: Sat Mar 15 02:07:24 GMT 2008