GZG List archives -- February 2008

Number 79 of 200 messages in this Archive
[Date Prev] Main Index [Date Next]
[Thread Prev] Thread Index [Thread Next]

Re: [GZG] [OFFICIAL] Question: was Re: [SG3]: What if?



--- Samuel Penn <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Even without this, training of human remote pilots
> is going to
> be easier than real pilots, since (as I believe you
> said, but
> I've snipped it now) they can learn from their
> mistakes. No
> more problems like the RAF faced in the Battle of
> Britain.

In addition to pilots being able to learn from their
mistakes, there is one far more important factor
easing pilot training :

Real fighter pilots need to be physically fit enough
to handle multi-G turns. A guy siting back at HQ
operating a remote doesn't need to be in very good
shape.

That provides a substantially larger pool of potential pilots.


      ____________________________________________________________________________________
Never miss a thing.  Make Yahoo your home page. 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mead.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU:1337/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l




  • Prev by Date: Re: [GZG] [OFFICIAL] Question: was Re: [SG3]: What if?
  • Next by Date: Re: [GZG] [OFFICIAL] Question: was Re: [SG3]: What if?

  • Previous by thread: Re: [GZG] [OFFICIAL] Question: was Re: [SG3]: What if?
  • Next by thread: Re: [GZG] [OFFICIAL] Question: was Re: [SG3]: What if?

  • Main Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Archive Index

    roger@nospam.firedrake.org
    Generated: Sat Mar 15 02:07:24 GMT 2008