Re: [GZG] [SG2] Momentum

["Owen Glover" <oglover@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Karl,

I have to agree with you there, however, this issue affects many rules
systems that we've played at our club; Stargrunt, Crossfire, Disposable
Heroes, Flames of War, Warhammer Ancients......, unless you come up with
an in house mechanism to deal with it I pretty mcuh think it will affect
any basic game system.

Certain scenarios can be like that too; Defense Attacks games for
example where a static defense results in much activity by the
assaulting force with often not a lot happening by the defender until he
commits reserves/counter attacks.

Still, I always thought that the vehicle rules let Crossfire down. Add
the move mechansim to Stargrunt and you pick up an excellent ranged fire
and vehicle rules!

Cross-Grunt anyone? Er.. Star-Fire I think is already taken....

Owen

> -----Original Message-----
> From: gzg-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:gzg-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
> K.H.Ranitzsch
> Sent: Tuesday, 5 February 2008 5:49 PM
> To: gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [GZG] [SG2] Momentum
> 
> 
> Owen Glover schrieb:
> > I think that the Crossfire concept of 
> Movement/Initiative/Interruption 
> > should work well enough.
> > 
> 
> I too like Crossfire, but there is one point that should be borne in 
> mind when thinking about such a mechanism. It is not well suited to a 
> multi-player game, as there tend to be long phases where most 
> players do 
> not have much to do.
> 
> Greetings
> Karl Heinz
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gzg-l mailing list
> Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> http://mead.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU:1337/cgi-> bin/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l
> 


_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mead.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU:1337/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l