GZG List archives -- October 2007

Number 22 of 56 messages in this Archive
[Date Prev] Main Index [Date Next]
[Thread Prev] Thread Index [Thread Next]

Re: [GZG] Microcarriers (was: NewCampaign)



Hi

We play scatter packs against ordinance does D3 hits and against heavy 
fighters is D3-1.

We do have multirole fighter technology.

Unfortunately I didn't chose that technology so I don't have that 
capability.

My fighters are robots and don't even get the luxury of internal hanger bays 
so I can't refuel them in a tactical battle.However racks only take up 6 
mass so I get 50% more

I am not convinced that people should "pay" for expenable munitions in a 
campaign. In order for that to balance out they would have to be 
significantly better on the tactical map or they would just become 
marginalised.

Its often difficult to take a tactical combat game and try and translate it 
into a campaing game when the points are balanced for the tactical game. I 
think the points are ballanced for the tactical game so we don't need to 
handicap players further. Also what is the cost of the expendible munition? 
For fighters it's a bit visible but for missiles and MKPs its not.

In this campaign we have 10 players each with their own fleet, there are 
some similarities but plenty of variation.

There have been some fun battles so far. 


_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mead.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU:1337/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l




  • Prev by Date: Re: [GZG] [OFFICIAL] SELWG CANCELLATION, and the NO-SELWG SALE....
  • Next by Date: Re: [GZG] Microcarriers (was: NewCampaign)

  • Previous by thread: Re: [GZG] Microcarriers (was: NewCampaign)
  • Next by thread: Re: [GZG] Microcarriers (was: NewCampaign)

  • Main Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Archive Index

    roger@nospam.firedrake.org
    Generated: Mon Nov 05 02:07:16 GMT 2007