Re: [GZG] [FT} Cloaked ships & Fighters

[Doug Evans <devans@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I find it easily going both ways. Cloaked is invisible, but preplotted
movement could mean planned, and the fighters could just keep up with the
plot. Non-cloaked screening fighters would be a dead giveaway for the
ship's location, of course.

Other hand, if fighters included in cloak, then they are invisible, but
also unable to do anything other than follow the plot until decloaked.

Or should a plotted 'break away from cloak' be allowed?

Other effects still swirling about my head...

That Beast Guy

PS Anybody else planning on attending special GenCon vendor's day?

Eric wrote on 07/27/2007 05:37:23 PM:

> If the cloaking field stops at the ship's hull, I would say that the
> fighter screen wouldn't even be possible.  How are they going to
> screen a ship when they can't find it?
>
> That said, I would tend to say that yes, the cloaking field only
> covers the ship itself.
> EF
> -----Original Message-----
> From: DOCAgren@xxxxxxx
> Sent: Jul 27, 2007 2:21 PM
> To: gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [GZG] [FT} Cloaked ships & Fighters
>
> Came up in a discussion recently, and well our little group is
> unsure about it.
>
> Would a Fighter Screen, screening a Cloaked Warship, be cloaked as
> well?  or does the field stop at the ship hull?
>
>
> DOCAGREN
>
> Just a Lurker here on the Digest, But maybe I have a good idea or 2..
> :-)

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l