GZG List archives -- July 2007

Number 74 of 102 messages in this Archive
[Date Prev] Main Index [Date Next]
[Thread Prev] Thread Index [Thread Next]

Re: [GZG] [FT] question on Missiles/subpacks



Richard Bell wrote:


On 7/24/07, *DOCAgren@xxxxxxx <mailto:DOCAgren@xxxxxxx>* <DOCAgren@xxxxxxx <mailto:DOCAgren@xxxxxxx>> wrote:

    *It is an odd one..  and I know this might require more of a fluff
    answer the a book 1.

    But can for example a FSE built missile launcher be reloaded with
    NI or OUDF or other nations missiles?  Same question on the Subpacks.*


While you are hoping for either a yes, or no, the correct answer is 'it depends'. If the FSE missile launcher is mounted on an FSE warship. the odds of it being able to use NI or OUDF missiles is likely to be low; unless, the FSE has a reason to conduct joint operations, or the FSE supplies the missiles launchers used on NI and OUDF warships. If the FSE missile launcher is mounted on an NI vessel, of course the NI will be able to reload it NI missiles (which would be licensed copies, or variants, of FSE missiles).


It took a lot of work for NATO to standardise on a set of shared weapon systems, so they could use any NATO supply depot. The early AIM-9's and soviet AA-2's were functionally identical and of a comparable size, but they were not interchangeable.
The OUDF SMLs - what few there are - are "Knock Off" copies of FSE designs, or actual FSE equipment acquired through various means, some of them almost legal. FSE missiles can be used in them. The launchers have been modified to use some OUDF missile designs which use fewer strategic materials that are rare in OUDF space, but are otherwise functionally identical.

Basically it all depends on the background. You can make everybody's missiles interchangeable, or make the minor differences such that the equipment, unless specifically designed to be flexible when it comes to ammunition, can only use that nation's stocks. In actuality, some 82mm mortars can use some 81mm ammunition, but the reverse is not true, and can lead to Nasty Accidents. This was a deliberate design decision on the part of the 82mm mortar designers.
_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l





  • Prev by Date: Re: [GZG] [FT] question on Missiles/subpacks
  • Next by Date: Re: [GZG] [OFFICIAL] Oops, missed a bit! (was: New SF 2mm (or 6mm, or 15mm...)!

  • Previous by thread: Re: [GZG] [FT] question on Missiles/subpacks
  • Next by thread: Re: [GZG] [FT] question on Missiles/subpacks

  • Main Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Archive Index

    roger@nospam.firedrake.org
    Generated: Tue Jul 31 01:07:24 GMT 2007