GZG List archives -- March 2007

Number 247 of 314 messages in this Archive
[Date Prev] Main Index [Date Next]
[Thread Prev] Thread Index [Thread Next]

Re: [GZG] IF Heavy Missles



He might be referring to the proposed new "anti-fighter" rules that seem certain to nerf Heavy Missiles to the point where there's not much point in using them.

Best regards, Robert Bryett

On 17/03/2007, at 14:38 , Laserlight wrote:

Reducing them means I
might as well as dump missles off and go pulse torps.

Not sure what you meant by that. The main point of teh Heavy Missile rules is the variable warhead/fuel loads. If you're saying you've tried these and want to modify them, then the Test list isopen to suggestions. We'd like to see an AAR or two.




_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l




  • Prev by Date: Re: Re: [GZG] IF Heavy Missles
  • Next by Date: Re: [GZG]FirstlookatnewNSLships!:-) [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

  • Previous by thread: Re: Re: [GZG] IF Heavy Missles
  • Next by thread: Re: [GZG] IF Heavy Missles

  • Main Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Archive Index

    roger@nospam.firedrake.org
    Generated: Sat Mar 31 01:08:45 GMT 2007