GZG List archives -- March 2007

Number 120 of 314 messages in this Archive
[Date Prev] Main Index [Date Next]
[Thread Prev] Thread Index [Thread Next]

Re: FT Fleet formations was Re: [GZG] FT vector movement systems



Remember when I said "Trivial"?  I do it just about every game.  I'd say it doesn't gain me much but it is rare for my big ships to take much damage.  Not that they couldn't but my small ships act as a screen and present much better targets.

NB:  I would not consider myself much better than a fair player.

Roger

On 3/6/07, Richard Bell < rlbell.nsuid@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:


On 3/5/07, Oerjan Ariander <oerjan.ariander@xxxxxxxxxx > wrote:


If OTOH you had played half a dozen games with either movement system, then
I would've mildly surprised if you *couldn't* work out appropriate
formation-change orders with at most a few seconds' extra effort.

And if you had been a veteran FT player with scores or hundreds of games
under your belt, then I would've been *extremely* surprised to hear that
you had problems working out formation-change orders on the fly - with that
much experience it would, as Roger Books wrote, be trivial.

Drop the other shoe.  What is the most complicated piece of coordinated multiship maneuvering that you have done?



_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l


  • Prev by Date: RE: [GZG] Daleks...
  • Next by Date: Re: FT Fleet formations was Re: [GZG] FT vector movement systems

  • Previous by thread: Re: FT Fleet formations was Re: [GZG] FT vector movement systems
  • Next by thread: Re: FT Fleet formations was Re: [GZG] FT vector movement systems

  • Main Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Archive Index

    roger@nospam.firedrake.org
    Generated: Sat Mar 31 01:08:44 GMT 2007