GZG List archives -- March 2007

Number 85 of 314 messages in this Archive
[Date Prev] Main Index [Date Next]
[Thread Prev] Thread Index [Thread Next]

Re: FT Fleet formations was Re: [GZG] FT vector movement systems



On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 03:28:32PM -0500, Laserlight wrote:

>Any formation is eay, if you want to maintain line of bearing.

The problems with formations in my experience are:

(a) you can't usefully mix thrust levels within a formation. Not a
problem if you're operating multiple ships of the same class, but it can
be somewhat limiting.

(b) when ships start to take drive thresholds, they have to fall out of
formation; this increases the number of effective manoeuvre units you
have, just when the game's already slowing down because you have to make
lots of decisions...

R
_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l




  • Prev by Date: Re: FT Fleet formations was Re: [GZG] FT vector movement systems
  • Next by Date: Re: FT Fleet formations was Re: [GZG] FT vector movement systems

  • Previous by thread: Re: FT Fleet formations was Re: [GZG] FT vector movement systems
  • Next by thread: Re: FT Fleet formations was Re: [GZG] FT vector movement systems

  • Main Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Archive Index

    roger@nospam.firedrake.org
    Generated: Sat Mar 31 01:08:43 GMT 2007