Re: [GZG] [Aliens] was Re: FMA at EEC etc

["john tailby" <John_Tailby@xxxxxxxxxx>]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Allan Goodall" <agoodall@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> On 3/1/07, john tailby <John_Tailby@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I didn't take it as rude as much as not interested. it sounded like a
> > classic case of "not invented here".
>
> I asked earlier, but didn't see a response. Do you have any specifics
> as to what happened? Can you repost your comments, so that the test
> listers can do a better job of replying?

It's not easy to go back through the posts the questions come down to:

What are the current version of the rules being play tested?
Where is a copy of the version of the play test rules so people can do 
battles of their own and provide feedback?
NB this means the "full rules" not just the fighter rules that have been 
floating around for some years. From discussions it became apparent that a 
lot of other changes have been made that impact the whole contentious area 
of ships shooting at ordnance.

What are the changes to the rules being tested about ships shooting at 
ordnance?
How many fire control of what types etc?

What changes have been made to weapons e.g. the stinger overload rule? I 
also saw something that suggested that scatter packs were only D3 kills per 
pack and no longer had ADFC built in.

What new technologies such as stealth have been developed and what are their 
rules?


What are the exact rules for anti matter missiles?
The wording proposed sounded like they "attack every ship within 3MU" and 
they don't make attack runs like normal missiles so more like a human 
version of the plasma bolt than a missile.

What is the exact turn sequence?

there were some questions about the wording in the rules that didn't look 
like it made sense but a look at a clean set of play test rules should make 
sense of that.

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l