RE: Re: Re: [GZG] ping

["Hudak, Michael" <mihudak@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Actually, I don't necessarily agree you've found any of that out, except
maybe for E.

You end up with some poor schmuck with a one shot surplus munition....
However hi-tech. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: 
> gzg-l-bounces+mihudak=state.pa.us@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:gzg-l-bounces+mihudak=state.pa.us@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> edu] On Behalf Of laserlight@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 2:09 PM
> To: gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: Re: Re: [GZG] ping
> 
> >> Good. We're happy to expend a drone just to find out the 
> existence of the mines; getting to kill an expensive missile 
> in the process is gravy.
> >
> >The remote sensor drone is essentially the equivalent of a 
> 19th century 
> >cavalry scout.
> 
> A little more, in this scenario. We've found out:
> 
> a. defenses are there
> b. defenses don't stop to identify before they shoot c. by 
> implication, something worth defending is there d. defenses 
> fire on low-mass, low-threat targets, implying an inability 
> to discriminate e. type of weapon for some of the defenses, 
> including thrust,  warhead yield, possibly targeting ability
> 
> All of this adds up to two things:
> a. we can sweep at least some of his mines by using balloons 
> with sensor emitters; b. then we can sell him better equipment
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gzg-l mailing list
> Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l
> 

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l