GZG List archives -- December 2006

Number 150 of 192 messages in this Archive
[Date Prev] Main Index [Date Next]
[Thread Prev] Thread Index [Thread Next]

Re: [GZG] Battlecruisers



Why, are we assuming that the standard "classes" ala the wet navies of today will have any bearing on how ships of the future will be designed. The old WWII "classes" have been pretty well replaced today. We still have aircraft carriers, but the DD, DE, Cruisers, BB's, BC's are all gone. They've been replaced with Frigates of various specialties. Weaponry has invalidated the heavy armament and now the smallest frigate can annihilate the largest BB that ever existed at ranges way beyond any gun range. Why do we assume that the WWII model will prevail 200 years from now?
_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l





  • Prev by Date: Re: [GZG] Battlecruisers
  • Next by Date: Re: [GZG] Battlecruisers

  • Previous by thread: Re: [GZG] Battlecruisers
  • Next by thread: Re: [GZG] Battlecruisers

  • Main Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Archive Index

    roger@nospam.firedrake.org
    Generated: Mon Jan 22 02:07:30 GMT 2007