GZG List archives -- December 2006

Number 147 of 192 messages in this Archive
[Date Prev] Main Index [Date Next]
[Thread Prev] Thread Index [Thread Next]

Re: [GZG] Battlecruisers



At 12:14 AM +0100 12/25/06, Oerjan Ariander wrote:

Sure they did; just like the USN called their pocket battleship-equivalents "large cruisers" rather than "battlecruisers". What they were called by their builders doesn't change the fact that the WW2 Scharnhorst and Gneisenau were quite similar to the USN Alaskas in both displacement and performance, contrary to your above claim that "only the USN built ships like that".

Except they had armor protecting them to the level of armament they had and the Alaskas are over twice as heavy displacement wise. The German pocket battleships were not armored in the same respect as their armament was significantly heavier than their armor protection.


An engagement between Alaska's and Deutschland's would have been entirely one sided. The Alaska's had more armor, more guns and more speed.

Though, pondering things, BC's would be, if not used for their primary commerce raiding or protection role or for their cruiser hunting counter recce role (in FT especially) would make excellent escorts for carriers. UP their PDS and ADS systems and otherwise use them in the ares between the carriers and the possible threats. This assumes if you actually have battles where the carriers are off separate from the battle line.


From HazeGray.org

Alaska class large cruisers
Displacement: 34,253 tons full load
Dimensions: 808.5 x 91 x 32 feet/246.4 x 27.8 x 9.7 meters
Propulsion: Steam turbines, 8 600 psi boilers, 4 shafts, 150,000 shp, 33 knots
Crew: 1769
Armor: 5-9 inch belt, 3.8-4 inch deck, 11-13 inch barbettes, 5-12.8 inch turrets, 5-10.6 inch CT
Armament: 3 triple 12"/50cal, 6 dual 5"/38cal DP, 14 dual 40 mm AA, 34 single 20 mm AA (CB 3-6: 15 dual 40 mm AA, 4 twin 40 mm AA, 24 dual 20 mm AA)


Concept/Program: These are the most misunderstood of all US cruisers. Although often called "battlecruisers", they were truly an outgrowth of cruiser design. They were in effect "big cruisers", whereas battlecruisers were better considered "lightly armored battleships". The Alaskas were intended as cruiser-killers, to hunt down and destroy enemy 8"-gun cruisers engaged in commerce raiding. They were a response to the powerful 8" cruisers being built abroad, and the end of the arms limitation treaties allowed the design to grow without artificial limits.


Deutschland class raiding cruisers

Displ: 11,700 tons standard; 15,900-16,200 tons full load
Dim: 610 x 71 x 24 feet
Prop: 8 Diesels, 54,000 hp, 2 shafts, 28 knots
Crew: 619-1,150
Arm: 2 triple 11 inch, 8 single 5.9 inch, 3 dual 4.1/65,
4 dual 37 mm, 6 20 mm, 8 21 inch TT (aw)
Armor: 2.25-3 inch belt, 1.5 inch deck, 3.25-5.5 inch turrets, 6 inch CT
Designed as long range commerce raiders, powerful enough to sink
anything they could not outrun and fast enough to outrun anything they
could not sink, except for HMS Hood, Renown and Repulse. Often classed
as "pocket battleships"; officially listed as Panzerschiffe
("armored ships"). In reality they were raiding cruisers built to
light cruiser standards and equipped with an exceptionally heavy main
battery.
--
--
Ryan Gill rmgill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
----------------------------------------------------------
| | | -==---- | O--=- | | /_8[*]°_\ |_/|o|_\_| | _________ | /_[===]_\ / 00DA61 \ |/---------\| __/ \--- _w/|=_[__]_= \w_ // [_] o[]\\ _oO_\ /_O|_
|: O(4) == O :| _Oo\=======/_O_ |____\ /____|
|---\________/---| [__O_______W__] |x||_\ /_||x| |s|\ /|s| |s|/BSV 575\|s| |x|-\| |/-|x| |s|=\______/=|s| |s|=|_____|=|s| |x|--|_____|--|x| |s| |s| |s| |s| |x| |x| '60 Daimler Ferret '42 Daimler Dingo '42 Humber MkIV (1/3)
----------------------------------------------------------


_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l




  • Prev by Date: Re: [GZG] Battlecruisers
  • Next by Date: Re: [GZG] Dec 25, 2006

  • Previous by thread: Re: [GZG] Battlecruisers
  • Next by thread: Re: [GZG] Battlecruisers

  • Main Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Archive Index

    roger@nospam.firedrake.org
    Generated: Mon Jan 22 02:07:30 GMT 2007