GZG List archives -- December 2006

Number 45 of 192 messages in this Archive
[Date Prev] Main Index [Date Next]
[Thread Prev] Thread Index [Thread Next]

Re: [GZG] [FT]Multi-abilityfightercostings



In a message dated 12/7/2006 7:19:47 AM Eastern Standard Time, laranzu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
Historically multiple ability fighters have fallen to
"jack of all trades, master of none" syndrome (eg the
F-111 was going to replace every other USAF and USN
fighter and fighter bomber). Our rather brief history
of spaceships suggests the same: the shuttle was
meant to replace everything, and instead doesn't do
anything particularly well.
 
Yes, but you are not mentioning the successful mutli-role fighter.bomber. The FA-18 Hornet and Super Hornet. Also the F-16 Faclon performed Fighter and light bombing missions. The F-14 Tomcat pefromed as both Strike Fighter and Interceptor to protect the carrier and fleet.
 
I have already been toying with multiability fighter in games and even prosented Jon with the idea of it.Even offered it to everyone here
 
Vince
_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l


  • Prev by Date: Re: [GZG] [Announcement] ZeroWear
  • Next by Date: Re: [GZG] [Announcement] ZeroWear

  • Previous by thread: RE: [GZG] [FT] Multi-ability fighter costings [sec=UNCLASSIFIED ]
  • Next by thread: [GZG] [FT]Multi-abilityfightercostings [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

  • Main Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Archive Index

    roger@nospam.firedrake.org
    Generated: Mon Jan 22 02:07:30 GMT 2007