GZG List archives -- November 2006

Number 202 of 428 messages in this Archive
[Date Prev] Main Index [Date Next]
[Thread Prev] Thread Index [Thread Next]

[GZG] re: Point Systems



>From: "john tailby" <John_Tailby@xxxxxxxxxx>

>Wargames also tend to remove any strategic element from the games 
>both sides line up in a roughly linear formation within heavy
weapons 
>range with enough models to cover the table from side to side. The 
>choice came down to which unit fired at which, scouting, finding 
>weaknesses in defences, having enough depth to form multiple lines
of 
>defence are not things easily replicated on a typical wargames
table.
>
>So I don't think that wargames are an attempt to simulate a
realistic 
>battle they are an artificial construct to allow both players an
equal 
>chance at achieving the objective of killing the enemy and holding
the 
>table.

That's where we disagree, here:

>Fortunately wargames are more fun than a real battle. There is a 
>distinct lack of comfortable chairs and beer and a marked increase 
>in bullets in a real battle. 

is where we agree.

--Glenn



 
__________________________________________________________________________________________
Check out the New Yahoo! Mail - Fire up a more powerful email and get things done faster. 
(http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta) 

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l




  • Prev by Date: RE: [GZG] New game mechanics [sec=UNCLASSIFIED]
  • Next by Date: Re: [GZG] re: Point Systems

  • Previous by thread: [GZG] re: OT - Wish me luck
  • Next by thread: Re: [GZG] re: Point Systems

  • Main Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Archive Index

    roger@nospam.firedrake.org
    Generated: Mon Dec 04 02:07:28 GMT 2006