GZG List archives -- November 2006

Number 179 of 428 messages in this Archive
[Date Prev] Main Index [Date Next]
[Thread Prev] Thread Index [Thread Next]

Re: Base Sizes (was Re: Re: [GZG] New game mechanics (was: Re: Namefor Rules))



If you don't specify an approximate base size you might run into some problems with other area effect weapons.

In Flames of War, conscript (poor quality) infantry have to be touching at least one other base to form a chain back to their platoon HQ to be in command. There are far more vulnerable to artillery templates than veterans that can have 6" between stands.


Or if you are assaulting, every stand within 2" of the enemy gets to fight so putting your units on a smaller base might gain you an advantage.


I also think that similar bases makes for a better looking game and more recognisable units amongst those that play.


_______________________________________________ Gzg-l mailing list Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l




  • Prev by Date: [GZG] DS2/DS3 TO&E?
  • Next by Date: RE: Base Sizes (was Re: Re: [GZG] New game mechanics (was: Re:Namefor Rules))

  • Previous by thread: Re: Base Sizes (was Re: Re: [GZG] New game mechanics (was: Re: Name for Rules))
  • Next by thread: RE: Base Sizes (was Re: Re: [GZG] New game mechanics (was: Re:Namefor Rules))

  • Main Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Archive Index

    roger@nospam.firedrake.org
    Generated: Mon Dec 04 02:07:28 GMT 2006