GZG List archives -- November 2006

Number 136 of 428 messages in this Archive
[Date Prev] Main Index [Date Next]
[Thread Prev] Thread Index [Thread Next]

Re: Re: Name for rules (was: Re: Blue Sky Thinking (was: Re: [GZG] re: Wanted)



On 11/3/06, laserlight@xxxxxxxxxxx <laserlight@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

SG, not S, so SG:AC should be fine. We just have to hope that people spell out "Assault Co" instead of shortening it by four letters.

You can't pronounce the SG:AC acroynym easily. "Ess Gee Ay See"... "Ess Gee, Ack". You can't with SG2 either, but Stargrunt is only two syllables, so it's easy enough just to say the word (it's all about syllable count).

I don't mind "S:AC" or "SAC" as it can be pronounced "Sack" (just like
Strategic Air Command). And it's "sack", not as in "a sack of..." but
in "I will sack your city!"

I can handle G-Cav or G-Cav 2 (Gee Cav), but I'm not too crazy about
"Grav Cav", for reasons Indy mentioned.

--
Allan Goodall            http://www.hyperbear.com
agoodall@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
awgoodall@xxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l




  • Prev by Date: Re: Re: Blue Sky Thinking (was: Re: [GZG] re: Wanted)
  • Next by Date: [GZG] [SG] Balancing Act

  • Previous by thread: Re: Re: Name for rules (was: Re: Blue Sky Thinking (was: Re: [GZG] re: Wanted)
  • Next by thread: [GZG] New game mechanics (was: Re: Name for Rules)

  • Main Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Archive Index

    roger@nospam.firedrake.org
    Generated: Mon Dec 04 02:07:28 GMT 2006