GZG List archives -- November 2006

Number 124 of 428 messages in this Archive
[Date Prev] Main Index [Date Next]
[Thread Prev] Thread Index [Thread Next]

Re: Name for rules (was: Re: Blue Sky Thinking (was: Re: [GZG] re:Wanted)



Grav Cavalry? Gravitic Cavalry?anti/null/whatever-Grav Cavalry?

Isn't FMA an insurance company?

Course, G-Cav 2 is fine, and you can put fluff like 'The popular press
seems to think it cool to shorten it to Grav Cav, but the grunts take their
cue from it's operational designation, G-Cav'. Is the whole love/hate
relationship with the press too American?

The_Beast

Mark wrote on 11/03/2006 09:22:24 AM:

>

> On 11/3/06, Robert W. Eldridge <bob_eldridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I like STARGRUNT - ASSAULT COMPANY, but "GRAV CAV" is
> pretty good too.
>
> SG:AC is fine, as is G-CAV2 (or the FMA* variants posted
> earlier). "Grav Cav" sounds too corny to me to take seriously.

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l




  • Prev by Date: Re: Name for rules (was: Re: Blue Sky Thinking (was: Re: [GZG] re:Wanted)
  • Next by Date: [GZG] RE: Undeliverable Mail

  • Previous by thread: Re: Name for rules (was: Re: Blue Sky Thinking (was: Re: [GZG] re:Wanted)
  • Next by thread: Re: Name for rules (was: Re: Blue Sky Thinking (was: Re: [GZG] re: Wanted)

  • Main Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Archive Index

    roger@nospam.firedrake.org
    Generated: Mon Dec 04 02:07:27 GMT 2006