GZG List archives -- November 2006

Number 122 of 428 messages in this Archive
[Date Prev] Main Index [Date Next]
[Thread Prev] Thread Index [Thread Next]

Re: Re: Name for rules (was: Re: Blue Sky Thinking (was: Re: [GZG] re: Wanted)



Probably right, though might have to go to StarGrunt, just to be sure. ;->=

As you point out, if you work hard, you can find SOMETHING to be naughty
about....

The_Beast

Chris wrote on 11/03/2006 08:33:08 AM:

> >S-AC works, tho' expect derogatory 'sack of...' comments;
>
> SG, not S, so SG:AC should be fine. We just have to hope
> that people spell out "Assault Co" instead of shortening
> it by four letters.

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l




  • Prev by Date: Re: Re: Name for rules (was: Re: Blue Sky Thinking (was: Re: [GZG] re: Wanted)
  • Next by Date: Re: Name for rules (was: Re: Blue Sky Thinking (was: Re: [GZG] re:Wanted)

  • Previous by thread: Re: Re: Name for rules (was: Re: Blue Sky Thinking (was: Re: [GZG] re: Wanted)
  • Next by thread: Re: Re: Name for rules (was: Re: Blue Sky Thinking (was: Re: [GZG] re: Wanted)

  • Main Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Archive Index

    roger@nospam.firedrake.org
    Generated: Mon Dec 04 02:07:27 GMT 2006