Re: Blue Sky Thinking (was: Re: [GZG] re: Wanted)

[mxconnell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]

1b

2a

3d  A strong MAYBE. As I already have 15mm, I'd be more inclined to make magnetic movement trays to group existing single figures.

4a Not to get hung up in semantics, but referring to it as SG3 implies superceding SG2. As I love the existing play level of SG2, I would prefer to see a parallel game (as FMAS is to SG2, SG2 is to XXX). StarCompany1?

 

Back to lurking,

Martin Connell

----- Original Message -----
From: Ground Zero Games
Date: Thursday, November 2, 2006 12:28 pm
Subject: Re: Blue Sky Thinking (was: Re: [GZG] re: Wanted)
To: gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

> 1) Do you (or have you in recent years) play SG2?
> a) Yes, with 25/28mm minis
> b) Yes, with 15mm minis but using standard SG2 - ie: single-
> based figures
> c) Yes, with 15mm minis but modified for group-based figures
> d) No, interested but have no opponents/time/money etc...
> e) No, not interested
>
> 2) Would the development of a game like we've been discussing
> (let's
> call it SG3) fit what you would want from a hard SF ground
> combat
> game?
> a) Yes, and I'd play it in 15mm
> b) Yes, but I'd still play it in 25/28mm (or 6mm, or anything else!)
> c) No, this level of game doesn't interest me
>
> 3) Would the development of SG3 in this direction tempt you into
> buying/collecting 15mm forces?
> a) Yes, I'd buy a new 15mm army!
> b) I already have a 15mm force waiting for a game system...
> c) No, I've got enough lead/scale/projects already!
>
> For all questions, feel free to add an "other" option (and
> discuss...) if none of those supplied really fits!
>
> Over to you all....
>
> Jon (GZG)

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l