GZG List archives -- November 2006

Number 47 of 428 messages in this Archive
[Date Prev] Main Index [Date Next]
[Thread Prev] Thread Index [Thread Next]

RE: Blue Sky Thinking (was: Re: [GZG] re: Wanted)



Jon,
    That is exactly the sort of game I'm interested in for 15MM.

                        Bob Eldridge

-----Original Message-----
From: gzg-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:gzg-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ground Zero
Games
Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 6:25 AM
To: gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Blue Sky Thinking (was: Re: [GZG] re: Wanted)

>That's not the point. It's not simply a matter of basing - I want a game
>where the basic element is a team, not an individual figure.


The direction in which I'm thinking is:

Each stand of 2-4 figures represents a fireteam of infantry or a 
specialist team (support weapon, observer, whatever).  Vehicles based 
as singles. Activations given to platoon-sized units (as in DSII), 
typically 6-9 infantry bases or 3-4 vehicles. Infantry small-arms 
fire (including small-calibre support fire)  resolved on a group 
basis, ie: one platoon vs.another with hits distributed among the 
target stands. Vehicle and other heavy weapons fire individually. 
Typical "player force" for a small-to-medium game with average tech 
levels would be reinforced company combat group, say a 2-3 platoons 
of infantry, one or two platoons of AFVs plus HQ and attached 
sections of supporting elements.

Is this the sort of level that most folks (assuming an interest in 
15mm at all) are interested in?

Jon (GZG)

>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: gzg-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>[mailto:gzg-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jaime Tiampo
>Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 12:40 AM
>To: gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: RE: Blue Sky Thinking (was: Re: [GZG] re: Wanted)
>
>>  Exactly my situation. If there was an SG type game that used 15MM
figures
>>  and had a fireteam type basing, I think I could persuade most of my
Flames
>>  of War players to play it.
>
>You could just play SG with the basing and use a token system to mark base
>degradation.
>
>Jaime
>
>_______________________________________________
>Gzg-l mailing list
>Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l
>
>_______________________________________________
>Gzg-l mailing list
>Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l




  • Prev by Date: RE: [GZG] Re: Blue Sky Thinking
  • Next by Date: RE: Blue Sky Thinking (was: Re: [GZG] re: Wanted)

  • Previous by thread: RE: Blue Sky Thinking (was: Re: [GZG] re: Wanted)
  • Next by thread: RE: Blue Sky Thinking (was: Re: [GZG] re: Wanted)

  • Main Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Archive Index

    roger@nospam.firedrake.org
    Generated: Mon Dec 04 02:07:27 GMT 2006