GZG List archives -- November 2006

Number 21 of 428 messages in this Archive
[Date Prev] Main Index [Date Next]
[Thread Prev] Thread Index [Thread Next]

Re: Blue Sky Thinking (was: Re: [GZG] re: Wanted)





On 11/1/06, laserlight@xxxxxxxxxxx <laserlight@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

You mean, after they finish screaming "Finish <expurgated> FT3, <deleted>! And <censored> FMAS! And <expunged> Bugs Don't Surf Because They Died of Old Age, <snipped>!" , I take it?
 
True dat.
 

I think it'd have the "between command levels" problem again. One squad, per FMAS, is fine. Two squads isn't a unit. Three squads plus a command element is around 20-30 figures, which is probably too much.
 
I disagree with your "isn't a unit" statement.  I would say there were plenty of examples where two squads were a "unit."  WW1, WW2, and Vietnam.  I'm sure there are more modern examples.  I'm almost positive that it will exist in the future.
 
I do agree with your "between command levels" comment though -- I don't think that would go away with using FMAS.  It might not be as evident using FMAS as as it is in SG2.
 
Damo
_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l


  • Prev by Date: Re: Blue Sky Thinking (was: Re: [GZG] re: Wanted)
  • Next by Date: Re: [GZG] New 25mm/15mm GZG gun pics up...

  • Previous by thread: Re: Blue Sky Thinking (was: Re: [GZG] re: Wanted)
  • Next by thread: Re: Blue Sky Thinking (was: Re: [GZG] re: Wanted)

  • Main Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Archive Index

    roger@nospam.firedrake.org
    Generated: Mon Dec 04 02:07:27 GMT 2006