GZG List archives -- October 2006

Number 312 of 323 messages in this Archive
[Date Prev] Main Index [Date Next]
[Thread Prev] Thread Index [Thread Next]

Re: Re: [GZG] Re:  Full Thrust Playtest? Plama bolts



Well, if there were two major categories of things that would draw point defense, we made them allocate in blocks as to how much got used against plasma, how much against missiles, and how much against fighters. Any point defense you fired at fighter attacks blew away an equal proportion of each different sort of fighters, with the idea that they were assumed to have good enough electronics that you couldn't easily tell who was equipped with torpedoes and who wasn't.

We also never would have had multiple "half squadrons" in our games, these got recombined. Fighter morale would've required too much bookkeeping (and our PBS usually held that the interstellar powers that used fighters in any numbers would usually use automated or lobotomized pilots of some sort that didn't care whether they survived or not).

In the actual games, missile-fighter combinations never actually came up. I was quite fond of combining plasma with fighters, because the area defense phalanxes that were most effective against fighters were natural targets for concentrated plasma. Missiles and fighters didn't really strike me as something where you got enough of a return on your investment to be worth combining instead of using just one or the other, so I never used them together. A combined plasma-and-fighter offense with beams for a modest secondary offense to keep people honest on ship-to-ship engagements and scatterguns to keep them honest on fighters were pretty much the optimal strategy in our games. (Yes, we mixed tech among the non-SV freely.)

E

----- Original Message ----- From: <laserlight@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 12:37 PM
Subject: Re: Re: [GZG] Re: Full Thrust Playtest? Plama bolts



>This is true, we rolled everything over in PDS and fighter fire against >other fighters, missiles, and plasma, if I recall correctly.

If you didn't allocate PDS, how did you do it? Let's say you have 3 cruisers with 6PDS each, defending against 5 missiles, 2 torpedo fighter squadrons, 2 intact standard fighter squadrons s and 2 half-squadrons of standard fighters.
_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l




_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l




  • Prev by Date: RE: [GZG] Re: Full Thrust Playtest? Plasma bolts [sec=UNCLASSIF IED]
  • Next by Date: Re: [FT] Unified Fighter Rules? Re: Re: [GZG] Re:  Full Thrust Playtest? (Simon White)

  • Previous by thread: Re: Re: [GZG] Re:  Full Thrust Playtest? Plama bolts
  • Next by thread: Re: Re: [GZG] Re:  Full Thrust Playtest? (Simon White)

  • Main Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Archive Index

    roger@nospam.firedrake.org
    Generated: Wed Nov 01 02:07:48 GMT 2006