GZG List archives -- October 2006

Number 306 of 323 messages in this Archive
[Date Prev] Main Index [Date Next]
[Thread Prev] Thread Index [Thread Next]

[FT] Unified Fighter Rules? Re: Re: [GZG] Re:  Full Thrust Playtest? (Simon White)



Is this what you mean? Takes a bit of searching without a modified subject.
;->=

I'll see if I can't sneak these into some tandem game demo's I'm planning.
Star Wars Starship Battles vs. Full Thrust 2.5+. Not sure when we'll see
the actual SW game, but at least we've got the rules.

The_Beast

Chris wrote on 10/30/2006 08:25:50 AM:

***snippage***
> That's what we need tested, though.
> See my post about a week ago with the "Short Form" rules.
> I want people to try that without having Oerjan's "Long
> Form" in front of them, so we can see if the short form
> explains enough.
***snippage***

Chris wrote on 10/25/2006 01:49:09 PM:

> >From: Oerjan Ariander <oerjan.ariander@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
***snippage
> (Cue LL with an URL..?).
>
> http://lists.firedrake.org/gzg/200504/msg00485.html

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l




  • Prev by Date: Re: Re: [GZG]  Full Thrust Playtest
  • Next by Date: Re: [FT] Unified Fighter Rules? Re: Re: [GZG] Re:  Full Thrust Playtest? (Simon White)

  • Previous by thread: Re: Re: [GZG] Re:  Full Thrust Playtest? (Simon White)
  • Next by thread: Re: Re: [GZG] Re:  Full Thrust Playtest? (Simon White)

  • Main Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Archive Index

    roger@nospam.firedrake.org
    Generated: Wed Nov 01 02:07:48 GMT 2006