GZG List archives -- October 2006

Number 296 of 323 messages in this Archive
[Date Prev] Main Index [Date Next]
[Thread Prev] Thread Index [Thread Next]

Re: [GZG] Full Thrust Playtest




I'm deliberately not specifying set up information except in one case: I'd like someone to try a missile fleet (Islamic Fed missile variants or custom.missile barges) vs a slow moving NSL fleet.

In regard to you last type of game. We did custom missile barges against custom slow moving fleets ~18 months ago. The custom missile barges won almost always.
The way to beat the firepower required interceptor fighters, massed PDS and ADFC as well as sacrificial decoys and escorts.

Did you try it using the Unified Fighter Proposal (including anti-ship weapons being able to shoot at missiles)? That's what I'm interested in: a plain NSL fleet, no banzai jammers, no fighters, versus a missile fleet.


For a custom missile barge try

Yeah, that's about what I had in mind. You can squeeze in a couple more missiles, I expect, if you have Mass 104 or something similar.


People have humorous arguments with this kind of ship, about whether it should get a mass reduction and therefore an increase in drive speed when it launches its missiles.

That would be plausible, but most ships don't launch enough missiles for it to make a difference. This one would drop mass by 32, to 68. You'd get Thrust 4.


_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l




  • Prev by Date: [GZG] Full Thrust 3rd Ed (Simon White)
  • Next by Date: Re: [GZG] Re: Full Thrust Playtest? organic tech

  • Previous by thread: Re: [GZG] Full Thrust Playtest
  • Next by thread: Re: [GZG] Full Thrust Playtest

  • Main Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Archive Index

    roger@nospam.firedrake.org
    Generated: Wed Nov 01 02:07:47 GMT 2006