GZG List archives -- October 2006

Number 292 of 323 messages in this Archive
[Date Prev] Main Index [Date Next]
[Thread Prev] Thread Index [Thread Next]

Re: [GZG] Re: Full Thrust Playtest? Plama bolts



John Tailby wrote:

Currently there is no incentive to use bigger than size 1 plasma bolts

There is one such incentive, though not a very strong one: each Plasma Bolt Launcher needs a separate operational FCS in order to launch. IOW, if you have 6 PBL-1s you need 6 operational FCSs to launch all of them at once, whereas if you have 1 PBL-6 you only need 1 operational FCS to launch.


But yes, we're aware that the FCS requirement isn't enough to outweigh the advantages of many small PBLs over a single big one.

The problem with using it the way it is is that it is a big mass hog and you get no mass reduction for larger systems.

1 PBL-6 + 1 FCS = 31 Mass

6 PBL-1 + 6 FCS = 36 Mass

Looks like a Mass reduction to me, though as I said above it isn't big enough.

Regards,

Oerjan
oerjan.ariander@xxxxxxxxxx

"Life is like a sewer.
 What you get out of it, depends on what you put into it."
-Hen3ry

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l




  • Prev by Date: Re: [GZG] Re: Full Thrust Playtest? (Simon White)
  • Next by Date: Re: [GZG] Re: Full Thrust Playtest? (Simon White)

  • Previous by thread: Re: [GZG] Re: Full Thrust Playtest? Plama bolts
  • Next by thread: Re: [GZG] Re: Full Thrust Playtest? Plama bolts

  • Main Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Archive Index

    roger@nospam.firedrake.org
    Generated: Wed Nov 01 02:07:47 GMT 2006