GZG List archives -- October 2006

Number 267 of 323 messages in this Archive
[Date Prev] Main Index [Date Next]
[Thread Prev] Thread Index [Thread Next]

Re: [GZG] Re: Full Thrust Playtest? (Simon White)



Another justification for FT3 (and one of the strongest for me) is that some
gaming groups do *not* tinker with the rules on their own. For them a new
rulebook represents a welcome revitalizing of the game that gets them playing
again. A new Dirtside book would work the same way for us here.

DSIII was being playtested at ECC-9 -- which in no way makes it DS-9.

In my opinion, "official" designs for all the *many* new ships are way
overdue as well. I like being able to just pick out the designs and get going.

Which is why we've had them posted online for..hm, quite a while now. As you can tell, from the flood of AARs that are rolling in every day....<grin>


_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l




  • Prev by Date: Re: [GZG] Re: [FT] Google Full Thrust Search Engine (BETA)
  • Next by Date: Re: [GZG] Re: Full Thrust Playtest? (Simon White)

  • Previous by thread: Re: [GZG] Re: Full Thrust Playtest? (Simon White)
  • Next by thread: Re: [GZG] Re: Full Thrust Playtest? (Simon White)

  • Main Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Archive Index

    roger@nospam.firedrake.org
    Generated: Wed Nov 01 02:07:47 GMT 2006