GZG List archives -- October 2006

Number 261 of 323 messages in this Archive
[Date Prev] Main Index [Date Next]
[Thread Prev] Thread Index [Thread Next]

Re: Re: [GZG] Re:  Full Thrust Playtest? (Simon White)



Never said it wasn't, but especially 'one place that doesn't have difficult
contradictions' seemed part of it. I was just thinking of ancillary reasons
to continue with the process.

You aren't rethinking your participation?

The_Beast

Chris wrote on 10/27/2006 10:29:45 AM:

> >5) A new publication makes it a new game in some folks
> eyes. Those who may have stumbled on the few glaring
> inconsistancies may give it another try. Others try ANYTHING new.
> >
> >Smacks of marketing, but Jon's not above that, nor should he be.
>
> Jon's in business to make money, after all.  But my
> (possibly mistaken) impression of the origin of FT III was
> "People have to buy four books (FT2.5, MT, FB1, FB2) to
> get all the rules--maybe we should put the rules into a
> single book?"

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l




  • Prev by Date: Re: Re: [GZG] Re: Full Thrust Playtest? (Simon White)
  • Next by Date: Re: [GZG] Re: Full Thrust Playtest? (Simon White)

  • Previous by thread: Re: Re: [GZG] Re:  Full Thrust Playtest? (Simon White)
  • Next by thread: Re: Re: [GZG]  Full Thrust Playtest

  • Main Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Archive Index

    roger@nospam.firedrake.org
    Generated: Wed Nov 01 02:07:47 GMT 2006