RE: [GZG] [FT] Belt Wars (Was: Seastrike scenarios to Full Thrust???).

["Michael Brown" <mwsaber6@xxxxxxx>]

So it's all my fault!

My minor contribution in 11 years on the list

:)
 
 
 
Michael Brown
mwsaber6@xxxxxxx
 
-----Original Message-----
From: gzg-l-bounces+mwsaber6=msn.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:gzg-l-bounces+mwsaber6=msn.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Doug Evans
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2006 6:05 AM
To: gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [GZG] [FT] Belt Wars (Was: Seastrike scenarios to Full
Thrust???).



Jon wrote on 10/27/2006 06:23:15 AM:

***snippage***
> Later on, Ariel re-released it as a boxed version, but
> still the same
> game; I don't recall there being any significant changes
> between the
> two ...

Roger; I still think there's a rules booklet similarly titled, but haven't
found it in the piles in the basement.

I did find the Ariel, and no, no attacker/defender, or as Battle Rider has
it, red-intruder, blue-native.  It's Michael's fault; his set made such an
impression, that it was what I was thinking of... ;->=

So the WRG ships were drawn with the military-style symbology?

The_Beast

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l