Re: [GZG] [FT] Belt Wars (Was: Seastrike scenarios to Full Thrust???).

[Doug Evans <devans@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Obviously, my fond memories are in error. ;->=

The_Beast

Robert wrote on 10/26/2006 09:13:07 AM:

> Seastrike did not have an "attacker-defender" format. The random
> drawing of objectives, and the option of changing from primary to
> secondary objective (where permitted) meant that either, both or
> neither player(s) could be "the attacker" at different
> points in the
> game.

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l