Re: [GZG] [FT] Belt Wars (Was: Seastrike scenarios to Full Thrust???).

[Robert N Bryett <rbryett@xxxxxxxx>]

Seastrike did not have an "attacker-defender" format. The random  
drawing of objectives, and the option of changing from primary to  
secondary objective (where permitted) meant that either, both or  
neither player(s) could be "the attacker" at different points in the  
game.

Best regards, Robert Bryett
rbryett@xxxxxxxx



On 26/10/2006, at 22:48 , Doug Evans wrote:

> One thing: he followed the attacker-defender format of Seastrike. I  
> think
> yours could be similarly divided.
_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l