GZG List archives -- October 2006

Number 239 of 323 messages in this Archive
[Date Prev] Main Index [Date Next]
[Thread Prev] Thread Index [Thread Next]

RE: [GZG] [FT] Belt Wars (Was: Seastrike scenarios to Full Thrust???).



I think that was an "enhancement" that was done for the web site (can't
remember whose).  I think the intent was to mix things up a little more
giving both side the possibility of using Attacker missions and forces

 
 
 
Michael Brown
mwsaber6@xxxxxxx
 
-----Original Message-----
From: gzg-l-bounces+mwsaber6=msn.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:gzg-l-bounces+mwsaber6=msn.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Doug Evans
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 6:53 AM
To: gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [GZG] [FT] Belt Wars (Was: Seastrike scenarios to Full
Thrust???).

Michael: I just remembered when looking back at my copy. D13 ends with
'Select another Attack Mission Card.' Typo, right?

The_Beast

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l




  • Prev by Date: RE: [GZG] [FT] Belt Wars (Was: Seastrike scenarios to Full Thrust???).
  • Next by Date: RE: [GZG] [FT] Belt Wars (Was: Seastrike scenarios to Full Thrust???).

  • Previous by thread: RE: [GZG] [FT] Belt Wars (Was: Seastrike scenarios to Full Thrust???).
  • Next by thread: RE: [GZG] [FT] Belt Wars (Was: Seastrike scenarios to Full Thrust???).

  • Main Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Archive Index

    roger@nospam.firedrake.org
    Generated: Wed Nov 01 02:07:47 GMT 2006