GZG List archives -- October 2006

Number 235 of 323 messages in this Archive
[Date Prev] Main Index [Date Next]
[Thread Prev] Thread Index [Thread Next]

RE: [GZG] Re: Ful lThrust Playtest? (SimonWhite) [SEC=UNCLASSIFIE D]



Phew!  Took a bit of reading to get through all of that.

I liked the way fleets were organised to limit force sizes.

Possible suggestion for trade routes, taking into account your FTL range.
Simply run a link between two systems that are less than the optimum FTL
jump range.  RPs move the full distance each turn (less the distance
penalty).  If any enemy ship stops on the trade route, that route is
interdicted and RPs are lost/fought over at the interdicted location by
convoy escorts.
This should cut down your paperwork a bit.

Ship fatigue: have you considered simply placing a break line at the maximum
hull damage point?  When repairing systems, increase the repair cost by
fatigue/max hull%.  After a while the increased repair costs will start to
accumulate more than the ship is worth.  Eg: 4/10 hull fatigue = +40% cost
to repair any destroyed systems (round down).  So a PDS would cost (3+40%= 4
pts) to repair and a hanger bay would cost (27+40%= 37 pts) to repair.  (For
ease, just add all the damage together and increase by 40% for in this case,
gives a rounding advantage of a few points).


Brendan
'Neath Southern Skies
http://home.pacific.net.au/~southernsk/

> -----Original Message-----
>  Doug Evans
> Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 8:01 PM
> Subject: RE: [GZG]Re:FullThrustPlaytest?(SimonWhite) 
> 
> You could back out to FTHouse, then to FTCamp, but here you go:
> 
> http://wiki.2-72.co.uk/wiki/index.php?title=FTCamp
> 
> Thanks again, Simon!
> 

IMPORTANT 
1. Before opening any attachments, please check for viruses. 
2. This e-mail (including any attachments) may contain confidential
information 
   for the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, 
   please contact the sender and delete all copies of this email. 
3. Any views expressed in this e-mail are those of the sender and are not 
   a statement of Australian Government Policy unless otherwise stated. 
4. Electronic addresses published in this email are not conspicuous
publications 
   and DVA does not consent to the receipt of commercial electronic
messages. 
5. Please go to http://www.dva.gov.au/feedback.htm#sub to unsubscribe emails

   of this type from DVA. 
6. Finally, please do not remove this notice.  

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l




  • Prev by Date: RE: [GZG] [FT] Belt Wars (Was: Seastrike scenarios to Full Thrust???).
  • Next by Date: Re: [GZG] Re: Full Thrust Playtest? (Simon White)

  • Previous by thread: [GZG] RE: [FT] Unified Fighter Rules? [sec=UNCLASSIFIED]
  • Next by thread: Re: Re: [GZG] Re: Full Thrust Playtest? (Simon White)

  • Main Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Archive Index

    roger@nospam.firedrake.org
    Generated: Wed Nov 01 02:07:47 GMT 2006