GZG List archives -- October 2006

Number 225 of 323 messages in this Archive
[Date Prev] Main Index [Date Next]
[Thread Prev] Thread Index [Thread Next]

Re: [GZG] [GZG-FT] Beta Fighters was Re: Full Thrust Playtest? (Simon White)



The Beast wrote:

>By the way, I thought you just spent CEF when receiving
>incomming to go evasive. You have to keep track of it separately?

The CEF you spend on evasion stays in effect for the entire game turn, so you need to remember it somehow.

I use LaserLight-style fighter group SSDs instead of dice to track fighter casualties and CEF use, but with an extra twist: instead of just marking each CEF box off as it is expended, I write an "E" for Evasion. (Similarly "A" for making an Attack, including attacking fighters or ordnance, and "S" for Secondary Move.)

Regards,

Oerjan
oerjan.ariander@xxxxxxxxxx

"Life is like a sewer.
 What you get out of it, depends on what you put into it."
-Hen3ry

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l




  • Prev by Date: Re: [GZG] Re: Full Thrust Playtest? (Simon White)
  • Next by Date: Re: [GZG] beta fighter rules--my impression

  • Previous by thread: [GZG] [GZG-FT] Beta Fighters was Re: Full Thrust Playtest? (Simon White)
  • Next by thread: Re: [GZG] Re: Full Thrust Playtest? (Simon White)

  • Main Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Archive Index

    roger@nospam.firedrake.org
    Generated: Wed Nov 01 02:07:47 GMT 2006