GZG List archives -- October 2006

Number 207 of 323 messages in this Archive
[Date Prev] Main Index [Date Next]
[Thread Prev] Thread Index [Thread Next]

Re: [GZG] FT] Beta Fighters was Re: Full Thrust Playtest? (Simon White)




Chris wrote on 10/24/2006 12:09:31 PM:

> >>Actually, I think I could maneuver the pen/marker down
> to tic off the mark
>
> Then you are not the lowest common denominator...in this case.
> :-)

Heck, any praise, even damning-with-faint, gratefully accepted... *bow*

To everyone else, sorry, but it's STILL nice to see something other than
spam and system messages in the mail queue.

As possible content, please see the nicely formatted page (Well done,
Simon) of Noam's e-mail on the beta test fighters. Quaintly left several
typos, I see. ;->=

http://wiki.2-72.co.uk/wiki/index.php?title=FTaddon_Fighter_Rules

The_Beast

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l




  • Prev by Date: Re: Re: Re: [GZG] FT] Beta Fighters was Re: Full Thrust Playtest? (Simon White)
  • Next by Date: [ECC] Cards was [GZG] Beta Fighters

  • Previous by thread: Re: Re: Re: [GZG] FT] Beta Fighters was Re: Full Thrust Playtest? (Simon White)
  • Next by thread: Re: Re: [GZG] FT] Beta Fighters was Re: Full Thrust Playtest? (Simon White)

  • Main Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Archive Index

    roger@nospam.firedrake.org
    Generated: Wed Nov 01 02:07:47 GMT 2006