GZG List archives -- October 2006

Number 195 of 323 messages in this Archive
[Date Prev] Main Index [Date Next]
[Thread Prev] Thread Index [Thread Next]

Re: [GZG] Re:  Full Thrust Playtest? (Simon White)



>From: mintroll-ft-list 
>Hi, I'm a closet reader - thought I'd finally make a post.

Welcome!

>http://lists.firedrake.org/gzg/200403/msg00286.html - these are a set of new fighter rules, and they're brilliant.

I'll say "thanks" on behalf of the Playtest list, although I didn't really have anything to do with these (other than forcing them to come up with sufficient evidence to overcome my pigheaded objections--which they did). 

It would be REALLY HELPFUL IN GETTING FTIII OUT SOONER (and therefore out of the way for DSIII, FMA Skirmish, and who knows, maybe even Bugs Don't Smurf) if people would 
a) TRY these fighter rules. Use sane designs, use stupid designs, stuff as many fighters onto that soap bubble as you can, whatever; and
b) REPORT whether you hated the new rules, love them, or don't care. If you love them, we'll assume it's because they fix the massed-fighters-problem; if you hate them, tell us why.

REALLY HELPFUL. Not that I'm, you know, trying to prod you or anything.

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l




  • Prev by Date: [GZG] Re: Full Thrust Playtest? (Simon White)
  • Next by Date: Re: [GZG] Re:  Full Thrust Playtest? (Simon White)

  • Previous by thread: Re: [FT] Unified Fighter Rules? Re: Re: [GZG] Re:  Full Thrust Playtest? (Simon White)
  • Next by thread: Re: [GZG] Re:  Full Thrust Playtest? (Simon White)

  • Main Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Archive Index

    roger@nospam.firedrake.org
    Generated: Wed Nov 01 02:07:47 GMT 2006