On 10/10/06, Adrian <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,
>Working on having each SG2 force a 'bit different' in equipment...
>
>I see the a 9 possible combination for fire arms:
>
>1. LTAR and SAW
>2. LTAR and Rotary SAW
>3. LTAR and Gauss SAW (?!?)
>4. AAR and SAW
>5. AAR and Rotary SAW
>6. AAR and Gauss SAW (??)
>7. Gauss AR and SAW (??)
>8. Gauss AR and Rotary SAW (?)
>9. Gauss AR and Gauss SAW
>
>Which, if any, of these strike you as an 'out of line' (ignoring $$ cost
>in Real Life) combination for a platoon?
None of them are really "out of line" per se, but a couple are a bit iffy.
If you're arming your forces with a low tech assault rifle, why are you
giving them gauss SAW (which would be higher tech and presumably higher
cost). If you had the tech base (or the economic base) to provide gauss
SAW, why not gauss AR also?
In other words, I'd cut out numbers 3 and 6.
Examples of these combinations show up in history, probably the most relevant being German Armed forces in WW2.
The Fallschirmjaeger (FJ - or paratroops) had a moderately complicated, highly crafted MG called the FJ42. It was clip (20 rounds) or drum-fed (50 rounds) and performed adequately. The Regular army had the MG34 - belt-fed with fire rates up to 800 rounds per minute, highly reliable and fewer parts than the FJ42. Why would the FJ use such an expensive, mediocre weapon when their standard infantry weapon was a semi-automatic carbine or a simple SMG (MP40)?
The primary reason was interservice rivalry - The FJ were under Luftwaffe control while the rest of the infantry was under Army Control. The FJ eventually converted to the MG34 and later MG-42 because the FJ was too costly and time-consuming to build in any large quantity.
The Germans had the technology to build superior assault rifles for many years (fully auto weapons shooting cut-down rifle rounds, rather than pistol rounds), but were hindered by objections from the top. Hitler objected to development of the assault rifle because he thought it a waste of resources, the designers proceeded anyway and hid it under the cover name MP44 (Machinepistol 44 or submachine gun 44). After development was completed and Hitler shown the effectiveness of the weapon, he changed his mind and allowed it to be put into production as the StG44 (Sturmgeweher 44 or 'storm' or assault rifle 44). That design was the basis for the AK-47 which has been in use for nearly 60 years.
So just because a country has the technology, industrial base, intellectual capacity etc. to design, build and distribute a high-tech weapon system doesn't mean that it will. Because of political or institutional stubborness a highly-effective system can be hindered from deployment, or an overly complicated, expensive system fielded despite its battlefield performance.
--Binhan