Re: [GZG] Failed to deliver the first time - SG 2

[Ryan Gill <rmgill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

At 8:15 AM +0300 10/11/06, John Atkinson wrote:
> 3 and 7 are wierd because if you're shelling out for gauss weaponry in
> one category, why are you using a inferior weapon in the other
> category?

Maybe they have fouled up procurement. Kind of an 
inverse of the .03 Springfield and the Chautchaut?

> Having said that, in the history of small arms procurement I think you
> can find wierder decisions than any of those above.

BING!
--
--
Ryan Gill              rmgill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
----------------------------------------------------------
           I speak not for CNN, nor they for me.
      But I do work there and still like the company.
----------------------------------------------------------
     |        |                   |         -==----      
     | O--=-  |                   |        /_8[*]°_\     
     |_/|o|_\_|       | _________ |        /_[===]_\     
     / 00DA61 \       |/---------\|     __/         \--- 
  _w/|=_[__]_= \w_    // [_]  o[]\\   _oO_\         /_O|_
 |: O(4) ==    O :|  _Oo\=======/_O_  |____\       /____|
 |---\________/---|  [__O_______W__]   |x||_\     /_||x| 
  |s|\        /|s|   |s|/BSV 575\|s|   |x|-\|     |/-|x| 
  |s|=\______/=|s|   |s|=|_____|=|s|   |x|--|_____|--|x| 
  |s|          |s|   |s|         |s|   |x|           |x| 
'60 Daimler Ferret '42 Daimler Dingo '42 Humber MkIV (1/2)
----------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l