RE: RE: [GZG] [brushfire]day2.5-daycycle-part2 [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

["Hudak, Michael" <mihudak@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

> On 10/6/06, laserlight@xxxxxxxxxxx <laserlight@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >From: Michael Brown
> > >Sounds like SHORT is the operative word.  IIRC 40% losses 
> to a unit will make it combat ineffective.  These are Company 
> (@100-150 troopers) size units, right? Hudak might want to 
> consider activating his bond, but Atkinson might want to 
> "re-group" too.
> >
> > I'm assuming that half or more of my "dead and wounded" 
> will return to duty at some point--maybe tomorrow, maybe 
> after the campaign finishes.
> >
> > And in fact, from a financial point of view, the Arrows 
> have lost considerably more than the Hooligans have.
> 
> You think the contract doesn't cover that?
> 
> Condittiere in 13th century Italy were smart enough to write 
> replacement horses into their contracts.  So do I.
> 
> John

I don't know about the contracts for this engagement, but if history is
any indication, with Atkinson controlling the media, Hudak is doomed.

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l