| Number 20 of 323 messages in this Archive | ||
|---|---|---|
| [Date Prev] | Main Index | [Date Next] |
| [Thread Prev] | Thread Index | [Thread Next] |
>From: Michael Brown >Sounds like SHORT is the operative word. IIRC 40% losses to a unit will make it combat ineffective. These are Company (@100-150 troopers) size units, right? Hudak might want to consider activating his bond, but Atkinson might want to "re-group" too.
I'm assuming that half or more of my "dead and wounded" will return to duty at some point--maybe tomorrow, maybe after the campaign finishes.
And in fact, from a financial point of view, the Arrows have lost considerably more than the Hooligans have.
You think the contract doesn't cover that?
Condittiere in 13th century Italy were smart enough to write replacement horses into their contracts. So do I.
John -- "Thousands of Sarmatians, Thousands of Franks, we've slain them again and again. We're looking for thousands of Persians." --Vita Aureliani _______________________________________________ Gzg-l mailing list Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l