GZG List archives -- September 2006
Re: Re: Re: [GZG] [SG] Rapid Fire antipersonnel plasma gun?
>Let's say you are dropping 10 colonies of 25,000 people each on Earth. Let's say you have one in New Zealand, another in Italy, a third in Argentina, a fourth in Ireland, another in New Jersey, another in Denmark, one in Moscow, one on the Cape of Good Hope, one in Florida, and one in Japan.
But you wouldn't necessarily do that, because everyone's gong to want to be reasonably close to a spaceport. Let's say all you need to land is a body of water (a la Pournelle's Falkenberg series)-- tt's still going to be more economical to have three settlements at the north, east and south side of the bay, instead of three separate bays on different continents. If it takes a physical starship landing field with infrastructure, then taht becomes a scarce resource for people to fight over.
Sure, military assault ships can land on unimproved fields. I'm assuming cargo ships don't usually have assault landers to make their orbit-to-surface deliveries.
_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l
Main Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Archive Index
roger@nospam.firedrake.org
Generated: Wed Oct 04 01:07:18 GMT 2006