GZG List archives -- September 2006

Number 117 of 145 messages in this Archive
[Date Prev] Main Index [Date Next]
[Thread Prev] Thread Index [Thread Next]

Re: [GZG] [SG] Rapid Fire antipersonnel plasma gun?



On 9/28/06, Allan Goodall <agoodall@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

You could ignore the terror effect and treat attacks by Heavy Weapons
the same as an attack by artillery. If the unit has to make a
Confidence Test due to Heavy Weapon fire, add 2, 1, or 0 to the Threat
Level for Low/Medium/High motivation troops.

Don't like that. Artillery is BAD because there is little an infantryman can do about it. Hunting tanks, on the other hand, is 'fun and easy' to use the USMC slogan. Equipped properly, there is a great deal a 'crunchy' can do to a tank.

John
--
"Thousands of Sarmatians, Thousands of Franks, we've slain them again
and again.  We're looking for thousands of Persians."
--Vita Aureliani
_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l




  • Prev by Date: Re: Re: [GZG] [SG] Rapid Fire antipersonnel plasma gun?
  • Next by Date: Re: [GZG] [SG] Rapid Fire antipersonnel plasma gun?

  • Previous by thread: Re: [GZG] [SG] Rapid Fire antipersonnel plasma gun?
  • Next by thread: Re: [GZG] [SG] Rapid Fire antipersonnel plasma gun?

  • Main Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Archive Index

    roger@nospam.firedrake.org
    Generated: Wed Oct 04 01:07:18 GMT 2006