RE: [GZG]re:NewtoRules-CloseCombatQuestion [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

["Robertson, Brendan" <Brendan.Robertson@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Giving the defender a suppression before assaulting can be useful; once they
withdraw or are forced back, they are in the open and suppressed.  Meaning
your followup gunfire can be devastating.

Give the defenders some (very bad) heavy weapons and reinforce to the
attacker that if they assault the enemy, then they will have to abandon the
heavy weapons (and will let the off-table armour pour through to attack the
enemies rear areas).  That should "motivate" the attacker to risk
close-assaults.


One tweak to the assault rules (which was an interpretation issue when I
started); the defender needs to make their morale check *before* they choose
whether to stand or voluntarily withdraw.  If you let them withdraw without
forcing the morale check your assault troops have a tendancy to gain the
position... And then get slaughtered in the point blank gunfire.
This also increases the likelyhood of a unit holding their ground if they
pass, as the followup for a successful assault can break a unit from
multiple followup moves (although the unlimited assault followup needs to be
house-rule restricted a bit as well).


Brendan
'Neath Southern Skies
http://home.pacific.net.au/~southernsk/


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Kinsey
> Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 9:37 AM
> Subject: Re: [GZG] re: New to Rules- Close Combat Question
> 

> I'm running a scenario where it's important for the attacker 
> to do things quickly. The attacker has PA and the defender 
> does not. Plus the attacker has better quality troops. It's 
> hard to convince the attacking player that closing the 
> distance and getting into close combat is much more effective 
> for him than sitting at distance and trying to get hits on 
> defenders in hard cover.
> 
> -Mark

IMPORTANT 
1. Before opening any attachments, please check for viruses. 
2. This e-mail (including any attachments) may contain confidential
information 
   for the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, 
   please contact the sender and delete all copies of this email. 
3. Any views expressed in this e-mail are those of the sender and are not 
   a statement of Australian Government Policy unless otherwise stated. 
4. Electronic addresses published in this email are not conspicuous
publications 
   and DVA does not consent to the receipt of commercial electronic
messages. 
5. Please go to http://www.dva.gov.au/feedback.htm#sub to unsubscribe emails

   of this type from DVA. 
6. Finally, please do not remove this notice.  

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l