GZG List archives -- August 2006

Number 134 of 248 messages in this Archive
[Date Prev] Main Index [Date Next]
[Thread Prev] Thread Index [Thread Next]

Re: OU and New Caledonia - was RE: [GZG] NSL Geopolitical Composition



So you support the alternate timeline where Kim Beasley came into power and remilitarised Australia to protect it's mineral wealth from hordes of Indonesian boat people?

If you want a militaristic future maybe NZ discovers offshore oil or other undersea minerals and so increases it's military capabilities to defend its resources against Japanese whaling fleets and other mineral resources.

Faced with a distracted France and being subverted by militant Islamic terror groups funded by Indonesia maybe NC asked or Australia decided it needed to act to protect it's own interests.

Neither NZ or Australia is likely to have the capability to manufacture arms in the next 50 years so they would need to buy them from somewhere. Historic links suggest their gear might will be Anglican.

Could be a bit of fun alternate history....
----- Original Message ----- From: <Beth.Fulton@xxxxxxxx>
To: <gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2006 11:45 AM
Subject: OU and New Caledonia - was RE: [GZG] NSL Geopolitical Composition



G'day,

I can't remember the circumstances for OU going to New Caledonia so this
is off the top of my head, but...

Why would Australia and NZ invade New Caledonia? The people enjoy
being part
of France and there is no mineral wealth worth taking.

Ignoring NZ's current capabilities (for one the event is decades into the future and things could change and two its fiction) New Caledonia may well have just been "picked up" as Australia and co went in to "settle down" violence arising from renewed tension between the native Melanesians and those descended from French settlers. Everytime there's been talk of a referendum on independence in the past the place has gone up like a fire cracker so maybe the same holds true into the future and the Australians and NZers "step in" as peace keepers initially.

Reasons for staying maybe that New Caledonia opted to ask to stay a part
of the OU. Alternatively (as this is a wargame) New Caledonia does have
mineral resources (cobalt, copper, gold, iron, lead, manganese, nickel,
and silver) and it has a fairly decent level of fisheries exports - so
that and other marine resources could be another impetus for remaining.

Cheers

Beth

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l



_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l




  • Prev by Date: [GZG] NPC History
  • Next by Date: RE: OU and New Caledonia - was RE: [GZG]NSLGeopoliticalCompositio n [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

  • Previous by thread: OU and New Caledonia - was RE: [GZG] NSL Geopolitical Composition
  • Next by thread: RE: OU and New Caledonia - was RE: [GZG] NSL Geopolitical Composition

  • Main Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Archive Index

    roger@nospam.firedrake.org
    Generated: Mon Sep 04 01:07:33 GMT 2006