GZG List archives -- August 2006

Number 88 of 248 messages in this Archive
[Date Prev] Main Index [Date Next]
[Thread Prev] Thread Index [Thread Next]

Re: Re: [GZG] [FT] Modern Naval?



On 8/16/06, Doug Evans <devans@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Aside from the occasional suicide small craft, do the ranges suggested for
most 'modern' battles negate the fiddly maneuvering FT2 would model? DS2
might just do the job then. Not that I'm anyone to speak to that.

Fiddly maneuvering has it's place in modern naval battles. Though the only real purpose of such fiddly movement would be to unmask your batteries to shoot down incoming missles. _______________________________________________ Gzg-l mailing list Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l




  • Prev by Date: Re: Re: [GZG] [FT] Modern Naval?
  • Next by Date: Re: Re: Re: [GZG] [FT] Modern Naval?

  • Previous by thread: Re: [GZG] [FT] Modern Naval?
  • Next by thread: Re: [GZG] [FT] Modern Naval?

  • Main Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Archive Index

    roger@nospam.firedrake.org
    Generated: Mon Sep 04 01:07:33 GMT 2006