GZG List archives -- August 2006

Number 85 of 248 messages in this Archive
[Date Prev] Main Index [Date Next]
[Thread Prev] Thread Index [Thread Next]

Re: [GZG] [FT] Modern Naval?





On 8/16/06, Roger Books <roger.books@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Everyone jumps from FT to Naval.  Wouldn't DS be a better base?  It doesn't take that
much modern ordnance to get a mission kill on a ship.


Perhaps because stock FT is so close to a WW2 naval wargame?  I guess the concept I'm looking for would be a cinematic version of modern naval wargaming -- not the realistic kind where one good missle hit will MK a ship.

For that FT would work well I think.  Then again DS would also work by modeling ships as multi-segment vehicles...

Damo


_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l


  • Prev by Date: RE: [GZG] [FT] Modern Naval?
  • Next by Date: Re: [GZG] [FT] Modern Naval?

  • Previous by thread: Re: Re: [GZG] [FT] Modern Naval?
  • Next by thread: Re: Re: [GZG] [FT] Modern Naval?

  • Main Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Archive Index

    roger@nospam.firedrake.org
    Generated: Mon Sep 04 01:07:33 GMT 2006